Your
telescope’s focuser is used to compensate for your near- or far-sightedness;
DIOPTRX™ compensates for your astigmatism. These units attach and lock onto the
tops of
Rotate to the best orientation.
over 20 long eye-relief Tele Vue eyepieces to achieve the sharpest
full-field viewing possible. DIOPTRX™ models are available in ¼ to 3½ diopter (¼ steps
from ¼ to 2½ diopters, then ½ diopter steps to 3½-diopters), and are rotatable for tuning to the best orientation.
A series of engraved letters on the barrel helps to monitor orientation. Simply
choose the DIOPTRX™ model that matches your eyeglass prescription for
astigmatism. All lenses are multi-coated glass in anodized aluminum housings
with rubber eyeguards.
HOW TO CHOOSE DIOPTRX™ MODELS
Your prescription may
look like this, with different numbers.
SPHERICAL
CYLINDER
AXIS
Right Eye
O.D.
+1.50
-0.50
45
Left Eye
O.S.
-0.50
+1.50
135
Ignore spherical and axis values.
Ignore all ± signs.
Simply choose DIOPTRX™
to match the cylinder (astigmatism) value of your preferred viewing
eye. In the example above, you would choose 0.5 diopter model for your
right eye and 1.5 diopter model for your left eye.
These adapters convert eyepieces with small eyeguards to larger eyeguards, so
DIOPTRX™ can be installed. Note that these eyepieces have shorter eye relief
than others recommended for DIOPTRX™, so to minimize any vignetting, it's best
to use these for deep-sky applications where your eye pupil is large.
Notes for Use with Bino-viewers
DEA-0001
When used for bino-viewers, you may encounter "nose relief" limitations
because DIOPTRX reduces the normal eyepiece eye relief.
DNA-6000
When used for bino-viewers, remove DIOPTRX, because limited "nose-relief"
and eye-relief will prevent seeing the full 82° field. The new larger
eyeguards are still fine for use with binocular viewers.
Further Reading
Some of the following links require Adobe Acrobat Reader
At TSP and RTMC in May and CSSP (Cherry Springs Star Party) in June, I had
the pleasure of evaluating over 100 subjects using our DIOPTRX™ astigmatism
correctors to evaluate both the absolute performance and performance relative to
their eyeglasses. I used a Tele Vue 60 with 60° diagonal and 32mm Plössl (5.3mm
exit pupil) to view our DIOPTRX™ test chart. In a few cases, I was able to confirm the
performance at night using a 35mm Panoptic and 12mm Nagler Type-4 on our TV
NP-127 to view star clusters. Most subjects did not have their eyeglass
prescriptions or know their eyesight astigmatism, but I have enough experience
now to guess at a reasonable starting point in trying DIOPTRX™. Since we had 10 models
in ¼ diopter steps of astigmatism from ¼ diopter to 2½ diopters, it was
easy for subjects to find their optimum values.
Following are some general conclusions:
DIOPTRX™ always works at least as good as eyeglasses and mostly better.
People who dislike using glasses and have astigmatism are most pleased.
Some people are lucky enough to have no astigmatism and will not benefit
from DIOPTRX™.
I found many people using progressive eyeglasses, which by definition are
horrendous for observing with telescopes or binoculars.
Many people do not realize that they don't need their eyeglasses if they
are near or farsighted and don't have astigmatism.
Critical observers easily detect as little as ¼ diopter of astigmatism.
DIOPTRX™ units can be stacked (one person had 5 diopters) to accommodate more
than 2½ diopters astigmatism.
It is easy (and analogous to focusing) to "dial in" rotation of DIOPTRX™
for optimum correction. It is virtually intuitive.
DIOPTRX™ units are very effective in binoviewers.
Night tests seem to confirm no discrepancies with our daytime tests.
Sharper stars and detection of fainter stars are clear benefits.
Choosing DIOPTRX™ values based on eyeglass prescription is generally
effective.
I was very gratified by the instant and positive unprompted reactions.
You might enjoy the following sample comments (sorted by astigmatism correction):
Star
Party
Customer
Initials
DIOPTRX™
Astig.
Value
Comments
RTMC
B.B.
0.25
"Can't tell."
TSP
A.D.
0.25
"Slightly better, noticeable."
RTMC
B.P.
0.25
"Makes a subtle difference."
TSP
J.S.
0.25
"Noticeable but not huge."
RTMC
S.A.
0.50
"I like it."
TSP
B.C.
0.50
"At least as good as glasses."
CSSP
G.C.
0.50
"An improvement over glasses."
TSP
P.C.
0.50
"Greater contrast, finer resolution."
CSSP
W.C.
0.50
"Great, a lot better."
CSSP
C.D.
0.50
"Wow -- makes a difference."
CSSP
B.G.
0.50
"About the same as glasses."
CSSP
K.G.
0.50
"Better than my glasses."
RTMC
S.G.
0.50
"Simply marvelous."
CSSP
J.K.
0.50
"Holly mackerel, very impressive."
TSP
A.M.
0.50
"Clearer than without glasses."
TSP
R.M.
0.50
"Better resolution."
TSP
S.M.
0.50
"Remarkably better."
CSSP
B.P.
0.50
"Looks like it's sharper."
CSSP
C.P.
0.50
"Wow!"
CSSP
C.S.
0.50
"Amazing, like being at doctor's office."
CSSP
J.S.
0.50
"Outstanding."
RTMC
T.S.
0.50
"WOW! Time to get the scope out, wonderful."
RTMC
J.T.
0.50
"O-wow."
CSSP
R.W.
0.50
"Amazing, incredible."
RTMC
A.B.
0.75
"Wow-wee, looks like a champ."
RTMC
B.L.
0.75
"Noticeable improvement"
TSP
G.M.
0.75
"Must have accessory"
TSP
K.M.
0.75
"Don't wear glasses. Much better. Helps tremendously."
TSP
M.P.
0.75
"Definitely sharper than no glasses. Equal to eyeglasses
but more contrast"
RTMC
J.S.
0.75
"Small difference, but better than glasses."
CSSP
P.B.
1.00
"Helps."
CSSP
L.C.
1.00
"Definitely better than glasses."
RTMC
T.D.
1.00
"Definite improvement."
CSSP
B.E.
1.00
"Wow - amazing."
TSP
J.E.
1.00
"Significantly better."
RTMC
B.H.
1.00
"Excellent, crystal clear."
RTMC
D.K.
1.00
"Slightly better than glasses."
RTMC
P.L.
1.00
"Wow, look at that. I’ll be damned."
TSP
J.S.
1.00
"About equal to eyeglasses."
CSSP
M.S.
1.00
"Maybe better than glasses."
CSSP
J.L.
1.25
"Definitely see a difference."
TSP
S.P.
1.25
"Better than eyeglasses."
CSSP
P.R.
1.25
"Fantastic."
TSP
G.S.
1.25
"Better than glasses."
TSP
E.B.
1.50/1.00
"O' my word, marvelous."
CSSP
S.D.
1.50/2.50
"Just as good as glasses."
CSSP
J.B.
1.50
"Incredible difference."
RTMC
D.C.
1.50
"Close or equal to eyeglasses."
RTMC
E.E.
1.50
"Makes a difference."
TSP
P.F.
1.50
"Not better than glasses."
CSSP
D.G.
1.50
"Better than with glasses."
TSP
J.K.
1.50
"Huge improvement, incredible."
TSP
G.M.
1.50
"Good grief, phenomenal, vastly better than eyeglasses,
marvelous."
RTMC
K.M.
1.50
"O' my god, I'll be darned."
RTMC
S.M.
1.50
"Dandy."
CSSP
P.P.
1.50
"Better than glasses."
TSP
A.S.
1.50
"Same or better than glasses."
TSP
R.T.
1.50
"Worked fine."
TSP
D.G.
1.75
"Very slightly better than glasses."
RTMC
L.K.
1.75
"Difference is amazing."
RTMC
J.P.
1.75
"Oh My Gosh."
RTMC
H.S.
1.75
"A little better."
RTMC
D.L.
2.00
"Amazing, sharper than my glasses."
CSSP
P.L.
2.00
"O’ my God, that’s the best view I’ve ever had through my
left eye. Good Lord, right on, Holy Hannah. That’s the real deal,
incredible, Wow, I’m amazed."
TSP
P.E.
2.25
"Better with DIOPTRX™."
TSP
D.F.
2.50
"A little sharper than eyeglasses."
RTMC
J.F.
2.50
"Bloody Fantastic."
TSP
F.H.
2.50
"Much better than prescription."
CSSP
T.L.
2.50
"Amazing."
RTMC
J.S.
2.50
"Really sharp."
DIOPTRX™ Owner's Comments
Dear Mr. Nagler,
I am writing to praise your DIOPTRX, which has changed my astronomical
life. You may recall that I was the first one you assessed at RTMC and I
replied, when I looked through the 2.5 diopter version, "Bloody
Fantastic!"
I immediately ordered one and I used it this past
weekend at 7,500 feet elevation, under beautiful dark skies in northern
Arizona (I have a Panoptic 27mm, a Radian 18mm a Radian 12mm and an 8"
SCT).
To me the great advantage is the ability to see the
entire field of view through an eyepiece. That is simply marvelous. I
spent hours this weekend viewing nebulae, star fields, etc., in a manner of
enjoyment I have never had. As my wife said, given the odd occasion when
she has glanced through my telescope with her glasses on (she does not
wear them for viewing normally), she always pitied me and other glasses
wearers who had to view with such restricted fields of view, even with the
longer eye relief eyepieces.
By coincidence, I had my annual visit to my optometrist yesterday, and
we discussed their use. I actually would need a 3.0 diopter for my right
eye and 2.75 for my astigmatic left eye, but he suggested I stay with the
2.5, as higher diopters (via stacking) would introduce possible
unnecessary aberrations, and the 2.5 works well for me. The net result is
that I ordered a second 2.5 DIOPTRX for use with my bino viewer (I have a
pair of Radian 18s), which now will get much more use.
A sincere
thank you for bringing it to market.
— Jim
Fitzpatrick, Scottsdale, AZ
Dear Mr. Nagler,
The DIOPTRX 1.25 gave me excellent results with my 41
Panoptic, 31 Nagler, 26 Nagler and 18 Radian. I used the DIOPTRX
in several different scopes I own (20 inch Starmaster f4.3, AP
Traveler f6, and AP 178 f9.) I found improvements in star images and the
appearance of Jupiter's moons in every scope/eyepiece combination
producing an exit pupil greater than or equal to 3mm. I did not find that
I needed more or less correction as the exit pupil became smaller or
larger.
It is obvious that you truly care about the amateur
astronomer and strive at every opportunity to enhance the experience of
visual astronomy.